Rule 96. APPEARANCE AND ARGUMENT BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT

Law students authorized to practice under these rules, see Rules 91–96, may co-author briefs, indicating their status on the signature line. A law student participating in a clinical program at a Georgia law school may be authorized to make oral argument if the supervising attorney of the program files a motion to authorize the law student to argue and includes in the motion the name of the student seeking to argue, the extent of the attorney supervision to prepare the student for argument, and a statement that the supervising attorney will be personally present and prepared to supplement any oral statement made by the student. The Court must give specific approval for the law student's participation in the argument. Law students and recent law school graduates are not eligible to present oral argument based on their participation in legal training programs organized in the offices of governments and non-profit organizations. XVI. PROVISIONAL ADMISSION FOR RECENT LAW SCHOOL GRADUATES